Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "The US Department of Justice stated that Trump does not "deserve Immunity for January 6 because he’s accused of inciting “imminent private violence.”
IT SEEMS THE ADMINISTRATIONS ATTORNEYS NEED A DICTIONARY. 1)
"INCITEMENT" IS DEFINED
In criminal law, as the encouragement of another person to commit a crime. Depending on the jurisdiction, some or all types of incitement may be illegal. 2)
Where illegal, it is known as an inchoate offense, where harm is intended but may or may not have actually occurred. 3)
THEY WILL HAVE A VERY DIFFICULT TIME PROVING "INCITEMENT" BECAUSE THE ACTUAL TEXT OF TRUMP'S SPEECH INCLUDED THE STATEMENT THAT THE CROWD SHOULD DO NOTHING ILLEGAL, BUT SHOULD LEGALLY PROTEST AND GO HOME.
THAT IS THE OPPOSITE OF INCITEMENT. 4)
But the door is open for a Trump lawsuit for "abuse of process" and "discrimination" causing him a lot of unnecessary expense. 5)
Because the Department has refrained (Refused) to prosecute Senator Schumer and several Congress members, whose statements were clearly within the definition of "incitement" which was followed by harassing and violent behavior." 6)