What does it mean? Literally every news story arranges “cherry-picked” information. Except in the case of something like a Wikileaks dump, you’re always editing, leading with the strongest information, etc. No one’s claimed this reporting is factually wrong, so… (1/2)
(2/2) The only possible gripe is someone thinks I’m sitting on tales of Republican pols being as shameless as, say, Adam Schiff. I’m not, but it’s all a canard anyway because this stuff isn’t really about either party, but an institutional problem any administration could abuse.
Also these people only think I have a trove of unprinted Trump letters. At best, they’re guessing. Meanwhile I know absolutely for sure these same outlets have stories ready to follow up now about Hamilton 68, the FBI, CISA, the EIP, GEC, etc, and have chosen not to do them.