profile picture for @WarClandestine
Invalid Date
@WarClandestine
  1. SARS-CoV-2 is a pathogen that was created in a lab, was engineered by humans, and killed millions of people worldwide.

Does that make SARS-CoV-2 a “bioweapon”?

According to the WHO and UN, it’s not a “bioweapon” unless it is released “deliberately”.

who.int/health-topics/…

194
1.2K
2.8K
85.5K
profile picture for @WarClandestine
@WarClandestine
  1. Russia and China have been accusing the US of creating biological weapons, but the US and NATO deny the term “biological weapon”.

Instead they say “gain of function”, “directed evolution”, “defensive research”, etc.

Different names, all the same thing. Deadly pathogens.

2) Russia and China have been accusing the US of creating biological weapons, but the US and NATO de
profile picture for @WarClandestine
@WarClandestine
  1. The Globalists justify creating pandemic-inducing pathogens, based on semantics.

They can call SARS-CoV-2 whatever they want. All we know is, they made it, it got out, and millions of people died.

And at what cost? To create “vaccines”?

“Vaccines” that didn’t even work?

profile picture for @WarClandestine
@WarClandestine
  1. Fauci and Collins of the NIH claim they lifted the ban on gain of function research in 2014, in order to get ahead of pathogens mutating.

In the process, they created a pathogen, it got out, and the “vaccines” they created were neither safe nor nih.gov/about-nih/who-…

profile picture for @WarClandestine
@WarClandestine
  1. Now we might be willing to entertain incompetence if these health agencies would have immediately admitted they made it, and stopped the spread.

But they didn’t. They lied. Covered up the origin. Covered up viable treatments. Censored scientists/journalists.

Complicit.

/END

5) Now we might be willing to entertain incompetence if these health agencies would have immediately