Bragg claims he is aware of other mystery crime(s) Trump committed, in order to elevate these bookkeeping misdemeanors, but Trump has not been convicted of any other crimes.
Wouldn’t Bragg have to prove the prerequisite crime first?
Let’s break this down.
If the initial crime isn’t legitimate, these 34 charges are misdemeanors. How is the initial crime not given to the defense?
I don’t think the most powerful man on Earth manages his ledger. These are minor bookkeeping crimes that Trump didn’t even commit.
Jaywalking is a more serious offense.
Not that he CANNOT tell us, that he is not “required” to tell us.
Meaning they are able to tell us, and are CHOOSING to withhold the initial crime(s)…
Why?
You all really think there are other unsealed indictments with Trumps “REAL” crimes, and they managed not to tell CNN this whole time?
Lol. IMPOSSIBLE 😂
They would have told us IMMEDIATELY.
According to New York State law, Bragg can indict former Presidents for process crimes they didn’t commit, over a crime he doesn’t have to tell us about, or prove in the court of law.
Theoretically, he could just make one up.
Because these aren’t legitimate criminal charges. It’s a media trial. It’s a political stunt.
The “crime” is irrelevant to them. It’s about generating negative headlines.
Because this isn’t about “justice” or the “rule of law”. This is about “getting” Trump.
This is just another institute weaponized by the Deep State to conduct election interference.
/END